ATS résumé checker by role
Every field trips the bots in its own way: nurses lose credentials, engineers lose logo grids, marketers lose designed templates. Pick your role to see what to watch for, then run a free check.
ATS résumé checker for software engineers
Engineering résumés are usually rich in keywords, so they rarely fail on content. They fail on layout: two-column developer templates, skill bars, and grids of technology logos that a parser can't read.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for data scientists and analysts
Data résumés often read like a narrative, with the real toolset tucked into paragraphs. The skills are there, but they're easy for a screen, and a recruiter skimming the parsed profile, to miss.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for nurses
Nursing résumés carry things most résumés don't: credentials after your name, licenses, a stack of certification acronyms, and clinical section headings. Each is a place a parser can slip.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for sales professionals
Sales résumés live and die on numbers, and numbers tend to end up in tables and graphics. That's exactly the content a parser flattens or can't see.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for finance and accounting
Finance résumés lean on credentials and figures. Put either in the wrong place and a parser drops it.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for operations and project managers
Senior operations résumés are where creative formatting creeps in: personal-brand headings, long histories, and certifications written only as acronyms.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for marketers
Marketers are the most likely to send a beautifully designed résumé, and designed résumés are what parsers handle worst.
Read the guide →ATS résumé checker for product managers
Product résumés are full of cross-functional work that's hard to name in keywords, and product titles vary so much that a screen can miss the match.
Read the guide →